dev-libs/openssl: sync

6 files changed, 9 insertions, 340 deletions

diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest b/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
index 8a76994..a86d270 100644
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
+++ b/dev-libs/openssl/Manifest
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-DIST openssl-3.0.8.tar.gz 15151328 BLAKE2B e163cc9b8b458f72405a2f1bde3811c8d0eb22e8b08ff5608ec64799975f1546dcdce31466b8a1d5ed29bc90d19aa6017d711987c81b71f4b20e279828cf753a SHA512 8ce10be000d7d4092c8efc5b96b1d2f7da04c1c3a624d3a7923899c6b1de06f369016be957e36e8ab6d4c9102eaeec5d1973295d547f7893a7f11f132ae42b0d
-DIST openssl-3.0.8.tar.gz.asc 833 BLAKE2B 1949801150e254e9be648f33014a4a16f803b42ca5a302c3942d377013e983e0ea0cca8aed594e3f9ecde26c6e31d222581e991af5fae6cd451d7ee83541f4bb SHA512 e1c04f1179aded228b39005fd9e9f6f75aedafb938b77ac58c97a00973eb412d93b92ad1c447332a5d96850b62b01093502928e6c190bdd0234a94c4e815d2a6
+DIST openssl-3.1.1.tar.gz 15544757 BLAKE2B 094f7e28f16de6528016fcd21df1d7382b0dbdcd80ec469d37add9c37f638c059dda3ffb4415eba890a33d146ddc9016bcc7192df101c73be5e70faf6e3b1097 SHA512 8ba9dd6ab87451e126c19cc106ccd1643ca48667d6c37504d0ab98205fbccf855fd0db54474b4113c4c3a15215a4ef77a039fb897a69f71bcab2054b2effd1d9
+DIST openssl-3.1.1.tar.gz.asc 833 BLAKE2B 5a2a9aeb475b843862e133d53bc5bb3c8e12e8e03b1e2da41d0eaa0eade1ae03c4318ad1f5c490c5e1ed7e6ac6275a6d7c881d99993911722b043b15d1622b25 SHA512 83349020c67e5b956f3ef37604a03a1970ea393f862691f5fd5d85930c01e559e25db17d397d8fd230c3862a8b2fba2d5c7df883d56d7472f4c01dab3a661cb2
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 111681f..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-https://bugs.gentoo.org/894140
-https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
-
-From d500b51791cd56e73065e3a7f4487fc33f31c91c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 17:56:58 -0500
-Subject: [PATCH] Fix Configure test for -mips in CFLAGS
-
-We want to add -mips2 or -mips3 only if the user hasn't already
-specified a mips version in CFLAGS. The existing test was a
-double-negative.
-
-Fixes: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/20214
----
- Configure | 2 +-
- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/Configure b/Configure
-index b6bbec0a85c4..ec48614d6b99 100755
---- a/Configure
-+++ b/Configure
-@@ -1475,7 +1475,7 @@ if ($target =~ /^mingw/ && `$config{CC} --target-help 2>&1` =~ m/-mno-cygwin/m)
-         }
- 
- if ($target =~ /linux.*-mips/ && !$disabled{asm}
--        && !grep { $_ !~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
-+        && !grep { $_ =~ /-m(ips|arch=)/ } (@{$config{CFLAGS}})) {
-         # minimally required architecture flags for assembly modules
-         my $value;
-         $value = '-mips2' if ($target =~ /mips32/);
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0464.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0464.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index dfe83e5..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0464.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,214 +0,0 @@
-commit 2017771e2db3e2b96f89bbe8766c3209f6a99545
-Author: Pauli <pauli@openssl.org>
-Date:   Wed Mar 8 15:28:20 2023 +1100
-
-    x509: excessive resource use verifying policy constraints
-    
-    A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
-    of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
-    that include policy constraints.  Attackers may be able to exploit this
-    vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
-    exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
-    (DoS) attack on affected systems.
-    
-    Fixes CVE-2023-0464
-    
-    Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-    Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
-    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20570)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-index 18b53cc09e..cba107ca03 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_local.h
-@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st {
- };
- 
- struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st {
-+    /* The number of nodes in the tree */
-+    size_t node_count;
-+    /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */
-+    size_t node_maximum;
-+
-     /* This is the tree 'level' data */
-     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels;
-     int nlevel;
-@@ -157,7 +162,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-                                              X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-                                              X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
--                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree);
-+                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+                                             int extra_data);
- void ossl_policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node);
- int ossl_policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl,
-                            const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid);
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-index 9d9a7ea179..450f95a655 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_node.c
-@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
- X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-                                              X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-                                              X509_POLICY_NODE *parent,
--                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
-+                                             X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-+                                             int extra_data)
- {
-     X509_POLICY_NODE *node;
- 
-+    /* Verify that the tree isn't too large.  This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */
-+    if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum)
-+        return NULL;
-+
-     node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node));
-     if (node == NULL) {
-         ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509V3, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
-@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-     }
-     node->data = data;
-     node->parent = parent;
--    if (level) {
-+    if (level != NULL) {
-         if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) {
-             if (level->anyPolicy)
-                 goto node_error;
-@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-         }
-     }
- 
--    if (tree) {
-+    if (extra_data) {
-         if (tree->extra_data == NULL)
-             tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null();
-         if (tree->extra_data == NULL){
-@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *ossl_policy_level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level,
-         }
-     }
- 
-+    tree->node_count++;
-     if (parent)
-         parent->nchild++;
- 
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-index fa45da5117..f953a05a41 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/pcy_tree.c
-@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@
- 
- #include "pcy_local.h"
- 
-+/*
-+ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to
-+ * a generous default of 1000 nodes.
-+ *
-+ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the
-+ * door on CVE-2023-0464.
-+ */
-+#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX
-+# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000
-+#endif
-+
- static void expected_print(BIO *channel,
-                            X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lev, X509_POLICY_NODE *node,
-                            int indent)
-@@ -163,6 +174,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-         return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
-     }
- 
-+    /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */
-+    tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX;
-+
-     /*
-      * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3.
-      *
-@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-     if ((data = ossl_policy_data_new(NULL,
-                                      OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL)
-         goto bad_tree;
--    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) {
-+    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) {
-         ossl_policy_data_free(data);
-         goto bad_tree;
-     }
-@@ -239,7 +253,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs,
-  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise
-  */
- static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
--                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data)
-+                                    X509_POLICY_DATA *data,
-+                                    X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
-     X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1;
-     int i, matched = 0;
-@@ -249,13 +264,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-         X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i);
- 
-         if (ossl_policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) {
--            if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL)
-+            if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL)
-                 return 0;
-             matched = 1;
-         }
-     }
-     if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) {
--        if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+        if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
-             return 0;
-     }
-     return 1;
-@@ -268,7 +283,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-  * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise.
-  */
- static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
--                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache)
-+                           const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache,
-+                           X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- {
-     int i;
- 
-@@ -276,7 +292,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-         X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i);
- 
-         /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */
--        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data))
-+        if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree))
-             return 0;
-     }
-     return 1;
-@@ -307,7 +323,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-     /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */
-     data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set;
-     data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS;
--    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) {
-+    if (ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) {
-         ossl_policy_data_free(data);
-         return 0;
-     }
-@@ -370,7 +386,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr,
-     /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */
-     if (last->anyPolicy &&
-             ossl_policy_level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy,
--                                       last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL)
-+                                       last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL)
-         return 0;
-     return 1;
- }
-@@ -553,7 +569,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree,
-             extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS
-                 | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE;
-             node = ossl_policy_level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent,
--                                              tree);
-+                                              tree, 1);
-         }
-         if (!tree->user_policies) {
-             tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null();
-@@ -580,7 +596,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree)
- 
-     for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) {
-         cache = ossl_policy_cache_set(curr->cert);
--        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache))
-+        if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree))
-             return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL;
- 
-         if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY)
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0465.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0465.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a98f7cb..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0465.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,46 +0,0 @@
-commit facfb1ab745646e97a1920977ae4a9965ea61d5c
-Author: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date:   Tue Mar 7 16:52:55 2023 +0000
-
-    Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf certs
-    
-    Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-    later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-    cert was bad.
-    
-    Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-    
-    Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-    Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20586)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 9384f1da9b..a0282c3ef1 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1654,15 +1654,23 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
-         goto memerr;
-     /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
-     if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
--        int i;
-+        int i, cbcalled = 0;
- 
-         /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
--        for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+        for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-             X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
- 
-+            if ((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0)
-+                cbcalled = 1;
-             CB_FAIL_IF((x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY) != 0,
-                        ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION);
-         }
-+        if (!cbcalled) {
-+            /* Should not be able to get here */
-+            ERR_raise(ERR_LIB_X509, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+            return 0;
-+        }
-+        /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
-         return 1;
-     }
-     if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0466.patch b/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0466.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9a315f4..0000000
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/files/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0466.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-commit fc814a30fc4f0bc54fcea7d9a7462f5457aab061
-Author: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-Date:   Tue Mar 21 16:15:47 2023 +0100
-
-    Fix documentation of X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy()
-    
-    The function was incorrectly documented as enabling policy checking.
-    
-    Fixes: CVE-2023-0466
-    
-    Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
-    Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20562)
-
-diff --git a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-index 20aea99b5b..fcbbfc4c30 100644
---- a/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-+++ b/doc/man3/X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_flags.pod
-@@ -98,8 +98,9 @@ B<trust>.
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set_time() sets the verification time in B<param> to
- B<t>. Normally the current time is used.
- 
--X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() enables policy checking (it is disabled
--by default) and adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() adds B<policy> to the acceptable policy set.
-+Contrary to preexisting documentation of this function it does not enable
-+policy checking.
- 
- X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies() enables policy checking (it is disabled
- by default) and sets the acceptable policy set to B<policies>. Any existing
-@@ -400,6 +401,10 @@ The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get_hostflags() function was added in OpenSSL 1.1.0i.
- The X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_host(), X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get0_email(),
- and X509_VERIFY_PARAM_get1_ip_asc() functions were added in OpenSSL 3.0.
- 
-+The function X509_VERIFY_PARAM_add0_policy() was historically documented as
-+enabling policy checking however the implementation has never done this.
-+The documentation was changed to align with the implementation.
-+
- =head1 COPYRIGHT
- 
- Copyright 2009-2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
diff --git a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.1.0-r2.ebuild b/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.1.1.ebuild
index 44362f8..d391173 100644
--- a/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.1.0-r2.ebuild
+++ b/dev-libs/openssl/openssl-3.1.1.ebuild
@@ -52,13 +52,6 @@ MULTILIB_WRAPPED_HEADERS=(
 	/usr/include/openssl/configuration.h
 )
 
-PATCHES=(
-	"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.0.8-mips-cflags.patch
-	"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0464.patch
-	"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0465.patch
-	"${FILESDIR}"/openssl-3.1.0-CVE-2023-0466.patch
-)
-
 pkg_setup() {
 	if use ktls ; then
 		if kernel_is -lt 4 18 ; then
@@ -113,6 +106,9 @@ src_prepare() {
 		einfo "Disabling test '80-test_ssl_new.t' which is known to fail with FEATURES=network-sandbox ..."
 		rm test/recipes/80-test_ssl_new.t || die
 	fi
+
+	# Test fails depending on kernel configuration, bug #699134
+	rm test/recipes/30-test_afalg.t || die
 }
 
 src_configure() {
@@ -134,6 +130,10 @@ src_configure() {
 	# Don't remove the no strict aliasing bits below!
 	filter-flags -fstrict-aliasing
 	append-flags -fno-strict-aliasing
+	# The OpenSSL developers don't test with LTO right now, it leads to various
+	# warnings/errors (which may or may not be false positives), it's considered
+	# unsupported, and it's not tested in CI: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/18663.
+	filter-lto
 
 	append-flags $(test-flags-CC -Wa,--noexecstack)